You may need to work with your IT to get a supported browser installed
to replace your current browser that is becoming obsolute.
Policies for providing interpreter services for faculty/staff | ||||
| 3/27/13 @ 02:49 PM
I'm looking for policies/procedures for providing services to deaf faculty and staff. Do other institutions have time line? Requests need to be in 2 weeks prior to event? Faculty/staff will be notified 24/48 hours prior to event re: status of request. Things like that. I would appreciate any assistance. | ||||
Reply to sbenton
Our office arranges accommodations for Deaf/HH students, staff, faculty, visitors, etc. We also have funding from the President's office to cover staff and faculty requests - most colleges/universities hold the hiring department of the d/hh employee accountable for the cost of accommodations and we do not agree with this philosophy. This approach is unhealthy because it by default establishes a hidden agenda among these departments who have to budget for these accommodations, are not likely to jump at the opportunity to hire Deaf/HH individuals, especially during these tough economic times. It's very discouraging to hear of colleges and universities holding these departments responsible for the costs when the employee actually serves "THE COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY' as a whole!
We also have a different philosophy with 'timelines, no shows, etc.' --- while we understand policies need to be in place to make the best use of our limited resources (physical and fiscal), it's already enough of a barrier to D/HH individuals having to schedule things in advance, explain to the second party why this scheduling approach needs to be considered (and sometimes the second party is still puzzled and believe that interpreters are literally walking around all day ready and available 24/7), submit a request, follow up, etc. We therefore 'politely request 5 days advance notice of any interpreting/captioning requests, but I'll be honest, how often do we know of meetings 5 business days ahead of time (not talking about the monthly staff meeting on the 2nd tuesday of the month) ? If a meeting is scheduled between an employee and supervisor for tomorrow or the next day, we will work to get that covered. We DO communicate the status of requests as often as we can, we do offer alternative times we have interpreters available (i.e. interpreters who have gaps in their schedules between classes) in the event there is flexibility for them to tweak their original meeting day/time, etc. Our info does state we will confirm an interpreter/captioner 48 hours prior - it is rare that we cannot cover something. This communication, we have found, has been more successful with accommodating meeting requests - and sometimes it also results in cost-effective strategies as well as utilizing the limited resources at best.
We are in an urban setting and have more availability of interpreters whether through our pool or agencies we contract with - those in rural areas will likely have a bit more challenge and may want to look into whether VRI is a more feasible option which would give better results in finding coverage with a shorter time frame to secure one. We also have remote captioning at our campus, again this gives much more flexibility and success with finding coverage (we get requests less than 24 hours and can get remote CART within 2 hours).
Reply to sbenton
Hi Sarah Benton and hello from Wisconsin!
I really like how Lauren added even more meat to this discussion; there are so many variables and no best practice among campuses. My campus DS office, for example, is different than Lauren's. We cover student needs, and faculty and staff as needed and if we have interpreters or captionists avaiable. IN other words, we are not funded to provide accommodations for deaf faculty and staff. It's not in our mission, not our budget. As Lauren pointed our, there are pros and cons to this.
On the matter of timelines, we seem to have moved more to a "please give us as much advance notice as possible," system. We always try to meet last minute needs, but we are in an urban environment, with a solid number of interpreters.
Here's a link to a 2009 survey we did. http://www.surveymonkey.com/sr.aspx?sm=JL1TiyKmSHAa22hUjUwm0CJx0Vr6O1IzP... number 45 asks:
45. If your office provides interpreting or captioning services to deaf or hard of hearing faculty/staff in different departments, how are these services financed? Check all that apply.
I realize this isn't exactly what Sarah wants to discuss, but it does effect these issues.